thecatamites
@thecatamites

hey, i'm playing a videogame. whatta rush. i move north through a corridor. i find a room. there's a turtle in it! i try talking to the turtle. it says, "nice day". i agree with the turtle. it moves away. i give gold to the turtle. it refuses! it's not so cheap. it moves away. i move away. we're on opposite corners of the room now. it says, "if you've a magic token, go to level 41". ah, a clue. an offer of peace. finally we're friends. i move closer to the turtle. it rotates to face me. i give it an egg. it accepts! "eggs are my favourite." i give it a plaster statue of a horse. it refuses but says "d-don't think you can get me like that!" the stammer is a clue. i offer it another egg. "it's too many. i'm dying." quickly i apply medicine herb. "thank you. if you want to buy weapons you can come to my store." the turtle becomes a tiny house shaped like a turtleshell. i climb inside and the turtle is there behind a desk. the shelf behind says KNIFE 100 PKNIFE 140 BKNIFE 3400. i interact with the turtle. "sigh! business is slow." it's true intimacy, an oasis in the desert! eventually i leave, pledging never to forget. who knew that a world of mystery and imagination was so close, right inside my computer. remembering the turtle's words i head to level 41. a wolfman attacks me and kills me utterly in one hit.



ellaguro
@ellaguro

the post in question:

the quotes:

there is this desperation of so many who work in the (video game) industry to be a part of a consequentially serious form of art, like film, that has this romantic social purchase and the weight of history tied to it. as (game designer) Chris Crawford said, game developers are very defensive about the sordid reputation of the field they work in. 'Content Creators' fondly reminiscing about a part of Zelda game they played in their youth on their youtube channel for 800k subscribers doesn't have quite the same ring to it as Martin Scorsese writing about how attending Fellini premieres in his youth profoundly changed him as a person. the environment that produced filmmakers like Fellini was shaped by huge upheavals of the social and political order that profoundly changed how film was viewed in broader society. and the fact is: so many of these game industry people who want video games to be a serious, consequential art form are unwilling to commit to what that actually means.

the way the indie space was prepping itself for primetime meant shaving off its own edges in an increasingly merciless manner in order to achieve correct respectability and palatability to the mainstream. if this sounds really at odds with the often highly personal source of inspiration Blow described games from the indie space as coming from, that's because it was. but it felt that whenever this crowd was hit with anything too weird and freaky for them that took this personal game mantra too seriously, they instantly would launch into "finish your game please" mode and hit people with treatises on the importance of polish.

your apparent lack of respectability as an outsider game developer was treated as a threat which endangered their long-term investment in this space - like a father lashing out at his children. you were looked down upon as an unserious joke for not following more conventional industry approaches and modes of presentation. but hey, if you play by the rules maybe one day you'll be called the great new auteur of the space by some journalist from The Atlantic who is hopelessly clueless to the world of games.

games developed by one or two people, especially from more recent years, often challenge the hegemony of industry norms and practices in much greater and more profound ways than commercial games made by larger numbers do. i have long argued that many game design 'rules' now read like the old "180 degree rule" in Hollywood used to read: perhaps there's some practical utility to those rules when putting together a work that a large number of people will experience. but they are also rules imposing a specific mode of artistic creation by companies underestimating the capacity of audiences, and unwilling to take larger risks. that means that many people who work in the industry and internalize these rules, if only out of sheer self-preservation for the sake of their jobs if nothing else, are often unable to see outside of them.

to me, if you are not interrogating more deeply how norms created by the markets that produce these rules, you are just giving the game industry a complete license to define what kind of experience is valid and what isn't. this has much more serious implications when it comes to the ability for experiences to exist that would never be able to be made by large studios.